BlogSlider2017-1
BlogSlider2017-5
BlogSlider2017-2
BlogSlider2017-7
BlogSlider2017-3
BlogSlider2017-4
  • Daniel dunn says:

    Nice review, I actually just bought this lens, and I agree on all points. I’ve used the 2.8 version a bit, and previously used and owned the non-is version. I wasn’t crazy about the f4, non-is for photo use, but I used it almost exclusively for video on a tripod, and it did that great. The 2.8 is awesome, but heavy and expensive, so those are drawbacks in my book, for my work.
    Anyway, thanks for the review, I love my lens.

  • […] and want to save on weight, the Canon EF 70-200mm f/4L IS USM just might be the right lens for you. Read a full review of this lens by outdoor and nature photographer, Michael Russell, who uses it for landscapes and […]

  • […] Lens Review: Canon EF 70-200mm f/4L IS […]

  • […] Canon’s had a 70-200mm f/4 lens in their lineup for years now, and it’s been hugely successful, so it makes sense that Nikon would also bring out a lens like this. […]

  • […] know that you Canon people have had a lens like this for a few years now, but for us Nikon people, the new AF-S 70-200mm f/4G ED VR is just what we […]

  • >

    WOULD YOU LIKE TO SAVE 20% ON MY BRAND NEW eBOOK?

    Sign up for my newsletter and I'll send you an exclusive discount code. 


    Terry Bourk

    I have read you new book “Behind the Landscape.” I could not “put it down” meaning that I kept at it because each photo you presented/analyzed was interesting and informative. I am trying to develop an eye for composition (both the scene and the light).

    Thank you! The examples you present and the suggestions are very helpful. Purple Mountains, McKinley River and Wonder Lake are fascinating.


    Roger Sinclair

    You have done it again! Another triumph.

    Your generosity to share, the clarity of thought and concise explanation thereof is brilliant. Perhaps I should also mention the beautiful photos and the talent necessary to produce them.

    Thank you, Dan.