Although I use Nikon, I’ve also listed a Canon equivalent for each lens. In the end, it really doesn’t matter which brand you use, it’s all about your eyes and vision.
If you do decide to purchase any of these lenses, click through the links to B&H or Amazon. It won’t cost you anything on your end, and I’ll get a small commission for the referral. Consider it your way of helping support this site and the effort that it takes to write these reviews for you.
If you can’t decide who to buy from, I’d go with B&H Photo. They have been in the photography business for more than 35 years and they are staffed with knowledgable sales people who are not on commission, and who are there to makes sure you get the right gear that will work for your needs. I recently took a personal tour of the store and sat down with people in the marketing department, and I can confirm that they’re indeed a great bunch of folks who are also passionate about photography just like you and me.
This is the widest lens that I currently own and it’s been a favorite of mine for years. It’s a little on the heavy side, but it’s durable construction and ultra wide angle rectilinear view make it a great choice for capturing action really close up, showing a vast view of the scene or shooting in very tight quarters.
As with any wide angle lens, it’s a little prone to flare when shooting towards the sun. However, when compared to many other lenses in this category, it performs way better in this area.
Overall, the Nikon 14mm f/2.8 ED is an all-out professional quality lens that will give you nothing less than professional results.
Canon has the Super Wide Angle EF 14mm f/2.8L USM lens, which is comparable in quality and construction.
View the Nikon 14mm f/2.8 lens at B&H Photo and Amazon
View the Canon 14mm f/2.8 lens at B&H Photo and Amazon
Nikon 24mm f/2.8D
Also a longtime staple of my camera bag, I’ve owed my 24mm f/2.8D lens for fifteen years. It’s gone with me on every single adventure and I’d never ever think of leaving it behind. It’s a great compromise of view, size, weight and price, and it performs well in all situations.
I use the 24mm f2.8 lens for everything- action, landscapes, environmental portraits, aerials… You name it, if I’ve shot it, then I’ve probably shot it with the 24mm at some time or another.
Canon also has a Wide Angle 24mm f/2.8 lens. It’s very similar in size, weight and price.
View the Nikon 24mm f/2.8 lens at B&H Photo and Amazon
View the Canon 24mm f/2.8 lens at B&H Photo and Amazon
Nikon 50mm f/1.8D
I’ve had a couple of 50mm lenses stolen over the years and I’ve replaced them every time. My current choice is the 50mm f/1.8D. It’s super lightweight, fast and does great in a variety of situations. It’s also relatively inexpensive.
The 50mm f/1.8 is a great travel lens and it rocks for shooting in low light or inside. I love it for people, portraits, still life, aerials, and general candid use, street scenes and editorial work. It’s the lightest weight lens I own and so it’s easy to take with me no matter where I go. I don’t use it often for sports and action, so when I do bring it out for that kind of work, it always gives me a fresh, unique perspective and look.
Nikon also has the new AF-S 50mm f/1.8G lens. It’s a great lens and features super fast silent wave motor focusing, but it’s a little heavier and costs almost twice as much. For most uses, I find the regular 50mm f/1.8 non AF-S lens works just fine. Canon’s version of the 50mm f/1.8 lens is very similar to the Nikon model.
View the Nikon 50mm f/1.8 at B&H Photo and Amazon
View the Canon 50mm f/1.8 at B&H Photo and Amazon
Nikon 85mm f/1.8D
I’ve had the Nikon 85mm f/1.8 for a number of years now, and it’s my favorite short telephoto lens. It’s fast, light and sharp. It’s absolutely awesome for portraits because of the pleasing way that it slightly compresses the features of the human face. In fact, it’s considered one of the two ideal portrait lenses, the 105mm f2.8 being the other.
Because it’s compact, and because it nicely isolates subject matter against a blurred background, the 85mm f/1.8 lens is also great for travel photography, sports, action and landscapes. It really allows you to focus in on what your shooting and highlight one or two simple elements in the frame.
I can’t say enough good things about my 85mm lens, or fast short telephotos in general. I rarely leave the house without it. Canon also has an 85mm f/1.8 USM lens.
View the Nikon 85mm f/1.8 at B&H Photo and Amazon
View the Canon 85mm f/1.8 at B&H Photo and at Amazon
Nikon 80-200mm f/2.8D ED
I’ve been using the 80-200mm f/2.8 lens ever since I turned pro fifteen years ago. In fact, I’m still using the same one that I bought in 1996. That alone is a testament to the quality of this awesome piece of glass. It’s outlasted 2 N90s, the D5, F100, D200, a D300 and I’m still using it every single week on my D700.
Put simply, the 80-200mm f/2.8 is my bread and butter lens. I’ve sold more photos that are shot with this lens than any other. Sure, it’s a heavy, but it’s built like a tank, it’s tack sharp and never lets me down, whether I’m shooting action, sports, adventure, people or distant landscapes. I’ve taken it around the globe and used it in just about every kind of situation.
The only reason that I’m not using the newer Nikon 70-300 f/2.8G ED VRII is because my 80-200 has not failed yet. If I had to buy a new one today, there’s a good chance I’d consider the 70-200 VRII, but for the money, you simply cannot beat the quality and versatility of the older 80-200 f/2.8. (It costs a thousand dollars less than the newer VRII model.) Check out my full comparison of these two lenses. This analysis applies to the Canon version as well.
Canon has the comparable 70-200mm f/2.8 Telephoto Zoom lens, as wells as the newer 70-200mm f/2.8 IS II image stabilization lens.
View the Nikon 80-200mm f/2.8D at B&H Photo and Amazon
View the Canon 80-200mm f/2.8 at B&H Photo and at Amazon


























Limited Time Deal: 










I totally want to pick up the 50, 85, and 80-200 lenses. Nice write up and examples for each lens.
Fantastic round-up. It’s great to see that you have a few lenses that I also have, and that you are getting amazing photographs out of them. It gives me no reason to say that my equipment limits me in taking good photos.
Hi Dan,
Did you use the same set of lenses when you used your D300 as your main camera, or did you use any DX specific lenses?
I still used the same lenses and with the same style during my D200 and D300 era. I didn’t buy any new DX specific lenses, I just made due with the crop sensor differences and reduced wide angle range. However, I did enjoy the increased telephoto range that the DX bodies gave my 80-200mm lens.
Thanks Dan – appreciate your response. Am enjoying the site and am reading through a couple of your eBooks.
I’ve got a D5000 at the moment so unfortunately can’t use older lenses in AF – am considering upgrading but stuck as to which way to go – can save up and go FX, can spend a good sum and go D7000 or spend a little and go D90… Or I could just stay where I am and maybe get a couple of the AF-S primes!
Thanks again,
Callum
It’s very hard to find places where you can get a good and true account of lenses, but you have managed it.
Thanks, Stephen. I appreciate the comment. Thanks for reading!
yeah Dan, good stuff, I’m basically trying to build up the same kit right now. I really like this selection of lens, with one super telephoto thrown on for wildlife stuff. But I’ll rent those for the foreseeable future.
Agree, renting is a definitely a smart option for the really big glass!
Great write up on your gear! I really like the way you add explantions on what you use each lens for. I am currently learning photography and have been reading, taking classes, practicing and learning from two friends that are photographers. I love it!!! I really like your work, although some it makes me feel very cold! I am not a big fan of cold weather (frost bite while in army). But your work is great!
Thanks for letting me ramble.
Hey Dan,
Another quick question for you – do you have any mid-zooms or have you never bothered?
I’m still thinking about getting a D700 and was thinking of getting the 24-70mm f2.8 but that’s going to be a pretty big hit to my budget. I’ve never seen you mention a mid-zoom so thought I’d ask – plus from what I see of you work it doesn’t seem to limit you – possibly the opposite!
Thanks,
Callum
Callum, I haven’t owned a mid range zoom in a long time. I just have a fixed 50mm and an 85mm to cover that middle range. You’re right, the fast zooms are great, but they’re big and expensive, which is why I usually just carry the wide angle and one or two of the lenses I mentioned above. I lose a bit in flexibility, but gain in having a small lens on the camera at all time, as well as saving some money. Hope that helps. -D
Thanks Dan – appreciate you taking the time to respond!