Lately, there seems to be a trend of overpuffed, self important people in the photo industry who claim that Photography is NOT about the gear. Well, I don’t know who those folks are, or what their qualifications are for making such arguments, but I wholly disagree with that utterly preposterous statement.
Of course, photography is about the gear. It’s always been about the gear. Even back in the day when the first Daguerreotypes were created, the process involved a camera, and as long as I’ve been using cameras, I can attest that they are indeed “gear.”
Despite what some people say, a camera is not just a light tight box. Not these days anyway, it’s a light tight box that holds a specially constructed light gathering sensor, lots of gears, wires, springs, microchips, circuit boards, mirrors, smoke and little electronic whizbangs that are all controlled by a series of strategically placed buttons, knobs, dials and miniature TV screens.
And then there’s the lens part. What about things like ED glass, internal focusing, multi-coating, De-focus control, vibration reduction, image stabilization, multiple groups of specially shaped ground glass elements? Yea, that stuff definitely qualifies as gear. And we haven’t even talked about accessories yet, not to mention computers and software…
Of course, let us not leave out the most important factor that determines whether something can be accurately considered “GEAR,” which is that every year, people who wear ties and lab coats keep making this stuff better. With each new model, we get more megapixles, faster autofocus, sharper lenses, more frames per second, more durable, lighter weight materials, more features, better electronic brains, smarter metering systems and yes, higher prices.
And do you turn away? No, you fawn over this stuff on the internet until such time as you simply cannot control your justification tendencies or your purchasing urges anymore. You happily run out and buy the brand new improved gear, which makes you excited and even more enthusiastic about taking even better pictures than you did before.
Some pictures cannot even be taken without special gear, and by special, I mean expensive. Try as you might, you simply cannot get the same photographic effects that things like a really big lens, a radio controlled TTL flash, or a 6-foot softbox will give you, without a f/2.8 lens, a radio controlled TTL flash, or a 6-foot softbox. Ok, maybe David Hobby can, but that’s only because after riding The Flash Bus for five weeks with Joe McNally and his 37 suitcases of lighting equipment last year, he probably has severe gear-overload issues. Who wouldn’t?
My point is that photography is inherently so gear intensive that the pure craft of image making cannot be separated from the gear. Whether it’s an old Leica or an AF-S IF ED VR lens, these ultra cool toys are so much a part of photography, that as photographers, we have literally become defined by our gear.
Sure, some folks might say that’s a bad thing, and that you can do make great photos with just an iPhone, but trust me, those are just the people who can’t afford a Nikon D4 or a Fuji X-Pro 1. Don’t listen to them. Doesn’t mean that you shouldn’t go buy one. You know you want to.
So, I’ll say it again. Photography is definitely about the gear. Don’t believe me? Then sell your cameras and take up drawing. Now that’s simple. No gear.
Oh, by the way, I hear the best sketch paper is the Strathmore 500 stuff with 106 lb. cotton rag paper and Ultra-Smooth Plate Finish that lets you create sharp lines and for detail work without feathering or bleeding, even when reworked with repeated erases.
We haven’t even started talking pencils yet…
This post begs posting a link to Liam Fitzpatrick’s iphone art!
I’ll trade you my old iphone for an 85mm lens.
This post seems to contradict the earlier post by you stating it is not about the gear.
You’re absolutely right, Peter. Hmmm… which one do you think more accurately reflects my true insight about gear and which one is a think is a blatant attempt to incite discussion and be funny? Thanks for reading.
I enjoyed both this post and the previous and seemingly contradictory post. I think both posts are correct. It’s not about the gear and it is about the gear. It’s always good to have the right tool for the job. In our high-tech society it’s easy to get a bad case of gear fever. You don’t necessarily need Thor’s Hammer for a penny nail even if you would look really cool carrying it around.
I certainly noticed the difference when I upgraded from a Nikon D90 to a D3s.
A good prime lens also makes a big difference especially in tricky lighting situations:
[…] Home Skip to content ← DxO FilmPack 3 Software Duh… Of Course Photography Is About The Gear → […]
I loved this article – came to it late after all the articles about not needing the latest expensive gear. Brilliant Dan. I appreciated and loved the humour.